article thumbnail

Court Pauses Challenge to FCC’s USF Forbearance Policy

Broadband Breakfast

The Benton Institute for Broadband and Society and the Media Alliance challenged the FCC’s decision to abstain from tapping broadband revenue for its $8.1 billion Universal Service Fund, something that would normally have happened when the agency reclassified broadband providers as Title II common carriers.

article thumbnail

1996 Telecom Act affords FCC clear, unambiguous authority for Title II rulemaking

EldoTelecom

They hope to convince the courts the FCC lacked authority to issue the rulemaking classifying Internet protocol-based services -- advanced telecommunications – as a common carrier telecom utility service under Title II of the Communications Act. So would posting to a website or social media site.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Consumer Groups Looking to Pause Narrow Legal Challenge to Net Neutrality

Broadband Breakfast

  The Benton Institute for Broadband and Society and the Media Alliance want to pause their USF issue because the FCC has the issue on reconsideration. Net Neutrality rules classified broadband as a common carrier service under Title II  of the Communications Act. 

article thumbnail

In a Changed Legal Landscape, the FCC Should Reconsider Net Neutrality Rules

Broadband Breakfast

and Ian Heath Gershengorn argued that any unilateral attempt by the Commission to treat broadband internet access service (BIAS) as a common carrier service under Title II of the  Communications Act of 1934  would be a “wasted effort.” Verrilli Jr. Please send pieces to  commentary@breakfast.media.

article thumbnail

Tech Think Tanks Fighting N.Y. Broadband Law in Supreme Court

Broadband Breakfast

At issue is the scope of state authority to regulate broadband ISPs after the FCC had classified them as lightly regulated information service providers under Title I  of the Communications Act and not as heavily regulated common carriers under Title II of the same law. Amicus briefs in support of the N.Y.

Broadband 106
article thumbnail

Network Neutrality Redux and the Return of Falsehoods and Disinformation

Telefrieden

Then again, some of them want to convert social networks into involuntary common carriers to deny them any sort of First Amendment editorial freedom. 1, 47-87 (2015); [link]. This sure looks like overreaching, legislating by unelected bureaucrats so reviled by the right. Lastly (I hope!),

Network 52