This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
” Angie Kronenberg , former general counsel and president of INCOMPAS, which represents independent ISPs and large software companies, said broadband providers should pay into the fund, given the lion’s share of USF money supports internet connectivity. Mattey has also authored a report arguing that’s the way to go.
“[This segment] provides high capacity connectivity and backhaul for traffic between Hawaii and the continental United States and is a valuable option for transpacific capacity and diversity,” Verizon said in a July 25 filing at the Federal Communications Commission. via an underwater fiber-optic network.
Federal Communications Commission votes to reclassify Internet access as a commoncarrier utility under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934 as expected April 25, it’s unlikely to increase affordable access. When the U.S. 202 , titled Discrimination and Preferences.
and Ian Heath Gershengorn argued that any unilateral attempt by the Commission to treat broadband internet access service (BIAS) as a commoncarrier service under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934 would be a “wasted effort.” Verrilli Jr. In contrast to the U.S.,
In the fourth decade since telecommunications began to shift to Internet protocol-based technologies, about half the connections to U.S. For analog voice telecommunications, public policy is to regulate them as commoncarrier utilities under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934 to ensure widespread, affordable access.
Cable TV franchises effectively became Internet service areas in the 2000s as cable companies began offering Internet connectivity and VOIP service in addition to video, putting them on a par with telephone companies’ Internet and VOIP services. That led a shift in regulatory policy, creating "video franchises."
There’s a lot of wiggle room in the criteria for a pro marketplace-oriented FCC to abandon commoncarrier rules and regulations. 160(a)(1)-(3). 160(a)(1)-(3).
Bear in mind that the FCC, not the Federal Trade Commission, has consumer protection jurisdiction for so-called Title II regulated commoncarriers, including ventures offering pre-paid and post-paid wireless service. Why would a facilities-based carrier pay over $ 1 billion to acquire a reseller of the carrier’s network?
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled that the FCC lacked authority to impose commoncarrier regulation on broadband Internet Service Providers like AT&T and Comcast. She believes that consumers should be able to determine how their internet connection is metered; without government protections, this is out of their control.
The end of the Affordable Connectivity Act (ACP) sets the stage for the potential modification of the Federal Communication Commission’s recently adopted rulemaking classifying Internet protocol-based services as a commoncarrier utility under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934.
A three-judge panel found last month that the Federal Communications Commission could not classify ISPs as Title II commoncarriers under the Telecommunications Act, ruling that the “best reading” of the statute required broadband be defined as a less-regulated information service. WASHINGTON, Feb.
It’s the latest in the yearslong game of political ping pong over the policy, which would classify ISPs as commoncarriers under the Telecom Act and subject them to more expansive FCC oversight. ” The decision was unanimous among the three Republican-appointed judges who heard the case on Oct.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content